|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |
'Cash for clunkers' coming soon Congress approves a measure to subsidize car purchases - consumers can get as much as $4,500 to trade in old cars. Vehicles bought after July 1 eligible. By Catherine Clifford, CNNMoney.com staff writer Last Updated: June 24, 2009: 11:18 AM ET WASHINGTON (CNNMoney.com) -- A $1 billion Washington program to give vouchers to consumers who replace junky cars with fuel-efficient models is likely to ramp up very soon. Congress passed the "cash for clunkers" measure late Thursday night as part of the $106 billion war spending bill. President Barack Obama plans to sign the bill into law. "We are gratified that the Congress delivered on this administration priority, and President Obama looks forward to signing it into law," according to an administration statement. Vehicles purchased after July 1 will be eligible for the refund vouchers worth as much as $4,500 to turn in gas guzzlers and buy new cars that are more fuel efficient. The agency in charge of administering the program, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, will work out all the details within 30 days of enactment, according to Rae Tyson, spokesman for NHTSA. Meanwhile, car dealers may honor rebates starting July 1. The federal agency needs the 30-day window to implement regulations to safeguard the program from fraud and abuse, Tyson said. Among the issues regulators might address: Does the consumer hold a valid legal title to the car he is seeking to trade in? Will the clunker be appropriately disposed of so that it can't be cashed-in again? The agency on Friday was scrambling to launch a Web site, www.cars.gov, to provide consumers with information about the program. The bill's passage comes as welcome news to automakers, which are struggling from a dramatic plunge in sales. "We really appreciate Congress' efforts to move this quickly across the legislative finish line," said Mike Moran, spokesman for Ford Motor Co (F, Fortune 500). Boosting the economy: Cash for clunkers proponents in Congress said the subsidies will spur sales. "The simple fact is that we need to get Americans into car showrooms and this is the bill that will do it," said Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., in a statement. Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said the program will boost jobs in auto states. Michigan's unemployment rate, the highest in the nation, hit 14.1% in May, the government reported Friday. "This program will provide an economic stimulus at a time when hardworking families need it most," Stabenow said in a statement. Still, cash for clunkers drew opposition from lawmakers who were opposed to spending more money on the auto industry. The move deepens the federal government's involvement in the auto industry. The Obama administration has said it will provide General Motors (GMGMQ) with another $30 billion in addition to $19.4 billion previously provided. How program will work: Clunkers eligible for the program must get 18 miles per gallon, or less, in combined city and highway driving. The subsidy ends up benefiting more owners of light trucks, SUVs and mini-vans more than it would owners of regular old passenger cars, auto experts say. A $3,500 subsidy can be used to purchase cars and vans that are more fuel efficient than the older clunkers by four miles per gallon. A $4,500 subsidy can be used toward purchasing cars and vans that are more fuel efficient than older cars by 10 miles per gallon. However, cars that have not been insured for the past year, or those that are older than 25 years, are not eligible to be traded in for vouchers. The supplemental bill approved Thursday sets aside $1 billion through fall. The program could make available as much as $4 billion in subsidies. The House passed a cash for clunkers plan Tuesday by a vote of 298-119. Congress could appropriate more funds for the program in the fall. Environmental lobbying groups had been pushing for a tougher bill sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., geared more toward cutting carbon emissions. -CNNMoney.com's Jennifer Liberto and CNN's Lisa Desjardins contributed to this report. First Published: June 19, 2009: 8:45 AM ET |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By James R. Healey, USA TODAY House Democrats and the Obama administration have agreed on a compromise for a so-called cash-for-clunkers bill. Similar to European programs, the legislation ? also called "fleet modernization" or "scrappage" ? would provide federal vouchers of up to $4,500 for people to trade in their vehicles for new ones that get better mileage. OPEN ROAD: Will you profit from cashing in your clunker? CHART: Summary of cash-for-clunkers agreement The European programs are expected to result in 400,000 to 500,000 more new vehicle sales this year than otherwise would be the case. Backers say a U.S. version could add 1 million sales at a time Chrysler is in bankruptcy court and General Motors is fighting to stay out. Both are operating on government loans. Talk of the vouchers has kept some would-be new car and truck buyers on the sidelines, waiting to see whether they'd qualify for government help. So, for the moment, the idea is hurting sales. Based on interviews with lobbyists and congressional offices, how it might work: Q: What's the idea behind "cash-for-clunkers"? A: Supporters say it would replace older vehicles with new ones that use less fuel, are safer and pollute less. And it would give the struggling auto industry a sales boost. Q: What's the bill's status? A: It's in a House committee and backed by the president. Senators from both parties are prepared to co-sponsor similar legislation as soon as this week. Q: Sounds like a sure thing. A: Not so. Environmental lobbyists, who don't think it boosts fuel economy enough, might derail it or get it changed enough in the Senate that a compromise would take awhile. Q: Any groups trying to keep it from being derailed? A: You bet. Car companies, autoworkers, component suppliers and car dealers, among them. The House bill "will help jump-start auto sales and the U.S. economy, while also providing environmental benefits and increasing energy security," says Ziad Ojakli, Ford Motor spokesman. Q: What's the price tag? A: About $4 billion. The money is currently proposed to come from Energy Department funding included in the already enacted $787 billion economic stimulus package. Q: If the House bill becomes law, how would it work? A: The government would send up to $4,500 to the selling dealer on your behalf, if you: 1. Trade in a car that ? this is a key point ? has been registered and in use for at least a year, and has a federal combined city/highway fuel-economy rating of 18 or fewer miles per gallon. 2. Buy a new car, priced at $45,000 or less and rated at least 4 mpg better than the old one (gets a $3,500 voucher). If the new one gets at least 10 mpg better, you get the full $4,500. Example: Trade that well-worn 1985 Chevrolet Impala V-8 police special, rated 14 mpg, for a 2009 Impala V-8 rated 19 mpg and the government will kick in $3,500. Downsize to Chevy Cobalt (27 mpg) or even a larger Honda Accord (24 mpg) and get $4,500. Mileage ratings back to 1985 are at www.fueleconomy.gov. Q: What about trucks? A: It's more complicated. For standard-duty models ? most SUVs, vans and pickups: 1. The old one must be rated 18 mpg or less. 2. The new one must be at least 2 mpg better for $3,500 or at least 5 mpg better for $4,500. For heavy-duties (6,000 to 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight rating): 1. The old one must be rated 15 mpg or less. 2. The new one must be rated at least 1 mpg better for $3,500, or 2 mpg or more for $4,500. Work trucks (8,500 to 10,000 lbs.) don't have mpg ratings, so age is the criteria. The old one has to be a 2001 model or older. And only $3,500 is available. Q: Is it worth it for $4,500? A: The assumption is that the people most likely to use the program would trade in cars worth less than $4,500. Thus, while not necessarily clunkers, most would be at least 8 years old. Q: Can I combine these incentives with other offers? A: Yes. For instance, you could trade for a hybrid and get the voucher, claim the hybrid tax credit and get dealer or manufacturer discounts. You also could deduct the sales tax, if any, on your next federal tax return. Q: Would I ever see the $3,500 or $4,500? A: No. It's an electronic transfer from the government to the dealer. Dealers want to be sure the amount can be counted as cash from the buyer, which would help buyers get credit because they're financing less. Q: What does the dealer do with my trade-in? A: Gives it to a salvage operator. The engine, transmission and some other parts must be destroyed so they can't be reused. The idea is to cull fuel-thirsty, polluting drivetrains. Operators can resell other parts, however. Q: What's to keep me from buying a junkyard car for a few hundred bucks, getting it barely running and trading it? A: The one-year-in-service requirement noted earlier. Lawmakers wanted to exclude the revival of so-called junkyard dogs, because they've already been taken off the road. Q: What do I get if I recently bought a car that would have qualified? A: The bill contemplates making the incentives retroactive to March 30, but it's unclear how to find and junk cars that were traded in that long ago. Some might already be back on the road, driven by new owners. Q: What's wrong with environmentalists' idea that the new car or truck should get much better fuel economy than the House bill currently requires? A: Opponents say the environmentalists' fuel-economy improvement thresholds are so high that foreign brands benefit disproportionately, because their lineups tend now to have more small, fuel-efficient vehicles. But the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy complained in a statement criticizing the House bill that the proposal as it stands now is way too lenient. The council charged that the bill "aims primarily to clear Detroit's unsold inventory from the storage lots," rather than to seriously cut fuel use. Q: How soon could this become law? A: Depends on how much critics can sway the Senate, and to what piece of legislation this "fleet modernization" bill is attached. If it becomes part of a larger bill that's likely to get lots of debate, it could take awhile. If it's attached to urgent, must-pass legislation, such as an appropriation bill, it could move quickly to the president's desk. A current plan is to add the program as an amendment to climate change legislation now being considered. As proposed, it would be in effect for just one year.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3330 Broadway
Oakland, CA 94611